doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2017-17-5-896-902


FEATURES OF DIFFERENCE SCHEME WITH CUSTOMIZABLE DISSIPATIVE PROPERTIES IN CASE OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL GAS AND GAS-PARTICLE DYNAMICS PROBLEMS

D. V. Sadin, S. A. Odoyev


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation: Sadin D.V., Odoev S.A. Features of difference scheme with customizable dissipative properties in case of two-dimensional gas and gas-particle dynamics problems. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2017, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 896–902 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2017-17-5-896-902

Abstract

Subject of Research.The paper presents testing results of difference scheme with customizable dissipative properties in the case of the two-dimensional problems for both gas dynamics and gas-suspensions mechanics. Method. The second order difference scheme is created with splitting of physical processes into two phases. The first phase uses the central difference, the scalar version of the nonlinear artificial viscosity limiters and semi implicit approximation of the interphase interactions. Reconstructions of TVD type are used at the second phase. Main Results. Testing was performed for problems with strong discontinuities when the shock waves interact with suspended particles. For illustrative test problems, the scheme with customizable dissipative properties has demonstrated a good quality of numerical solutions at the level of the WENO5 scheme with the ability to resolve fine details of the flow in case of multiple interactions of shock waves, contact discontinuities and rarefaction waves. Possible oscillations of the numerical solution in the proposed scheme are suppressed by setting its dissipative properties. Practical Relevance. The scheme with customizable dissipative properties is the basis for the development of applied software package as a justification tool for the attainable level of technical solutions with the use of the gas suspensions flows.         


Keywords: gas dynamics, gas-particle mixture, numerical simulation, test problems, dissipative properties, stability

References
 1.     Le VequeR.J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press, 2002, 580 p.
2.     ToroE.F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 3rd ed. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2009, 724 p.
3.     VolkovK.N., Deryugin Yu.N., Emel'yanov V.N., Kozelkov A.S., Teterina I.V. Difference Schemes in Gas DynamicProblems on Unstructured Grids. Moscow, Fizmatlit Publ., 2015, 416 p.
4.     NigmatulinR.I. Dynamics of Multiphase Media. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 464 p. (In Russian)
5.     GidaspowD. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization. Academic Press, 1994,467 p.
6.     CroweC.T., Schwarzkopf J.D., Sommerfeld M., Tsuji Y. Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2012, 487 p.
7.     HudsonJ., Harris D. A high resolution scheme for Eulerian gas–solid two-phase isentropic flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, vol. 216, pp. 494–525. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.12.010
8.     SadinD.V. A modified large-particle method for calculating unsteady gas flows in a porous medium. Comp. Maths Math. Phys., 1996, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1453–1458.
9.     SadinD.V. A method for computing heterogeneous wave flows with intense phase interaction. Comp. Maths Math. Phys., 1998, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 987–993.
10.  SadinD.V. On the convergence of a certain class of difference schemes for the equations of unsteady gas motion in a disperse medium. Comp. Maths Math. Phys., 1998, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1508–1513.
11.  SadinD.V. Stiffness problem in modeling wave flows of heterogeneous media with a threetemperature scheme of interphase heat and mass transfer. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2002, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 286–290.
12.  SaurelR., Le Metayer O., Massoni J., Gavrilyuk S. Shock jump relations for multiphase mixtures with stiff mechanical relaxation. Shock Waves, 2007, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 209–232.
13.  SurovV.S. Hyperbolic models in the mechanics of heterogeneous media. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2014, vol. 54, no. 1,pp. 148–157. doi: 10.1134/S096554251401014X
14.  ToroE.F. Riemann-problem based techniques for computing reactive two-phase flows. Lecture Notes in Physics, 1989, vol. 351, pp. 472–481. doi: 10.1007/3-540-51968-8_108
15.  SaurelR., Abgrall R. A multiphase Godunov method for compressible multifluid and multiphase flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 425–467. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6187
16.  TokarevaS.A., Toro E.F. HLLC-type Riemann solver for the Baer-Nunziato equations of compressible two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, vol. 229, no. 10, pp. 3573–3604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.01.016
17.  BulatP.V., Volkov K.N., Ilyina T.Y. Interaction of a shock wave with a cloud of particles. IEJME - Mathematics Education., 2016, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2949–2962.
18.  SadinD.V. TVD scheme for stiff problems of wave dynamics of heterogeneous media of nonhyperbolic nonconservative type. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2016, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2068–2078. doi: 10.1134/S0965542516120137
19.  ChristiansenR.B. Godunov Methods on a Staggered Mesh - An Improved Artificial Viscosity. Technical Report UCRL-JC-105269. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1991.
20.  BensonD.J., Schoenfeld S. A total variation diminishing shock viscosity. Computational Mechanics, 1993, vol. 11, no. 2-3, pp. 107–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00350046
21.  CaramanaJ., Shashkov M.J., Whalen P.P. Formulations of artificial viscosity for multi-dimensional shock wave computations. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 70–97. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5989
22.  HirschC. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. V. 2. Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. NY, Wiley, 1990.
23.  FringerO.B., Armfield S.W., Street R.L. Reducing numerical diffusion in interfacial gravity wave simulations. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2005, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 301–329. doi: 10.1002/fld.993
24.  LiskaR., Wendroff B. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2003, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 995–1017.
LiskaR., Wendroff B. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 995–1017. URL:      http://www-troja.fjfi.cvut.cz/
~liska/CompareEuler/compare8.pdf


Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика