doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2018-18-5-870-877


DETERMINATION OF OVERLAPPING REGION FOR ELECTRONIC MODULE IMAGES

O. A. Ignatenkova, M. S. Grigorov


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:
Ignatenkova O.A., Grigorov M.S. Determination of overlapping region for electronic module images. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2018, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 870–877 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2018-18-5-870-877


Abstract
This paper deals with the examination of features of methods for determination of special points on electronic module images aimed at evaluating their application possibility for determination of an overlapping region. The conclusion is drawn about an insufficiency of the application of these methods for the unique determination of an overlapping region presence. Also this research considers features of the transformation to the uniform center of coordinates of electronic module image regions which do not have an overlapping region. We study a matrix decomposition of projective image transformation to the superposition of simple geometrical transformations for the image obtained within the conditions of formation of electronic module image regions. We propose an algorithm which determines an overlapping region presence of a couple of image regions of electronic modules based on the analysis of a projective transformation matrix and determination of parameters of an affine and projective transformation of images in case of their coercion to the uniform center of coordinates. The proposed algorithm is invariant with respect to scale changes and orientation of a pair of crosslinking images of electronic module regions and allows excluding images obtained with the distortions, which exceed admissible values, during the image stitching. The developed algorithm can be used for optimization of automated computer algorithms of processing of electronic module images and an acquisition of a large-scale electronic module image of the required quality.

Keywords: overlapping region of images, image transformation, electronic module

References
  1. Ignatenkova O.A., Osipenko A.A. Large-scale images of electronic modules. Proc. Int. Science-Technical Conf. on Problems of Fundamental and Applied Informatics in Control, Automation and Mechatronics. Kursk, Russia, 2017, pp. 42–44.
  2. Osipenko A.A., Ignatenkova O.A., Grigorov M.S., Basov O.O. Justification for need of combined use of automatic optical inspection and nondestructive x-ray control of electronic modules. Research Result, Information Technologies Series, 2017, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3–8. (in Russian) doi: 10.18413/2518-1092-2017-2-2-3-8
  3. Theodoridis S., Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition. 4th ed. NY, Academic Press, 2009, 984 p.
  4. Rankov V., Locke R.J., Edens R.J. et al. An algorithm for image stitching and blending. Three Dimensional and Multidomensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing. San Jose, 2005, pp. 190–199. doi: 10.1117/12.590536
  5. Adel E., Elmogy M., Elbakry H. Image stitching system based on ORB feature based technique and compensation blending. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2015, vol. 6, no. 9. doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2015.060907
  6. Pankov V.V., Kaplieva N.A. Creating panoramic images with the computer vision methods. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Systems Analysis and Information Technologies, 2014, no. 4, pp. 71–74. (in Russian)
  7. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110. doi: 10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94
  8. Bay H., Ess A., Tuytelaars T., Gool L.V. Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2008, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 346–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
  9. Tsudikov M.B., Akimenko T.A., Gorbunova O.Y. Hardware and software creation of a panorama. Izvestiya TulGU, 2012, no. 3, pp. 356–363. (in Russian)
  10. Khan N.Y., McCane B., Wyvil G. SIFT and SURF performance evaluation against various image deformations on benchmark dataset. Proc. Int. Conf. on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, 2011, pp. 501–506. doi: 10.1109/DICTA.2011.90
  11. Harris C., Stephens M. A combined corner and edge detector. Fourth Alvey Vision Conference. Manchester, 1988,
    pp. 147–151. doi: 10.5244/c.2.23
  12. Trajkovic M., Hedley M. Fast corner detection. Image and Vision Computing, 1998, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 75–87.
  13. Matas J., Chum O., Urban M., Pajdla T. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image and Vision Computing, 2004, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 761–767. doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.006
  14. Fischler M.A., Bolles R.C. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 1981, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 381–395. doi: 10.1145/358669.358692
  15. Putyatin E.P., Yakovleva E.V., Lyubchenko V.A. Decomposition of the centro-affine transformation matrix for normalization of images. Radioelektronika i Informatika: Khar'kovskii Natsional'nyi Universitet Radioelektroniki, 1998, no. 4, pp. 91–94. (in Russian).


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика