doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-5-901-911


PLATFORM-BASED SOLUTIONS AND DESIGN MODULARITY FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES AS STANDARDIZATION AND UNIFICATION ROUTINE.

V. Y. Prokopyev


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:

Prokopyev V.Yu. Platform-based solutions and design modularity for electronic devices as standardization and unification routine. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 901–911 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-5-901-911



Abstract

Subject of Research. The paper considers a concept of platform approach for automated electronic devices design. The concepts of “platform-based development” and “unification and standardization of developments” are compared. Analysis was carried out on our own examples of ellipsometric equipment family development and the development of a nanosatellite platform of the CubeSat standard. Method. The decomposition of these platform solutions into unified modules is presented. Quantitative indicators of project-to-project unification were calculated for these two cases in accordance with regulatory documents. By experience, the typical value of the project-to-project unification indicator specified in the technical tasks for the development of devices ranges from 60 % and higher. Main Results. For the family of ellipsometers the value of project-to-project unification coefficient equal to 96.3 % was calculated. For the nanosatellite platform a value of project-to-project unification coefficient equal to 84 % was obtained. Both values exceed significantly the value of typical given values. It is shown that chosen fragmentations of platforms into unified modules outlined in the paper are optimal from functional differentiation between modules point of view. Practical Relevance. Advantages of the platform approach are demonstrated on personal experience of development of high- speed ellipsometric equipment and a universal nanosatellite platform of the Cube Sat standard. It is shown that the obtained high rates of unification are achieved due to the modular principle implementation for design of electronic subsystems. Years of successful experience in effective design of new automated devices within the existing platform is consistent with qualitative calculations. The quantitative value of standardization and unification indicators can serve as a main factor for the adoption of engineering and management decisions on changes in the products being developed.


Keywords: platform approach, modular design principle, physical measurement automation, ellipsometric setup, nanosatellite, CubeSat standard, standardization, unification

Acknowledgements. The section of this work relative to nanosatellite platform design was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation: project identification number RFMEFI57517X0154.

References
1. Prokopyev V.Yu. Designing of the four channel ADC controller for optical radiation measurements. Transaction of scientific papers of the Novosibirsk state technical university, 2014, no. 3(77), pp. 25–36. (in Russian)
2. Rykhlitski S.V., Spesivtsev E.V., Shvets V.A., Prokop’ev V.Y. Spectral ellipsometric complex ELLIPS-1891 SAG. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta, 2012, no. 2. pp. 161–162. (in Russian)
3. Rykhlitski S.V., Spesivtsev E.V., Shvets V.A., Prokop’ev V.Y. Scanning ellipsometric setup MICROSCAN-3M. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta, 2009, no. 3, pp. 155–156. (in Russian)
4. Shvets V.A., Chikichev S.I., Prokop’ev V.Yu., Rykhlitskij S.V., Spesivtsev E.V. Ellipsometric complex for studying rapidlyrunning high-temperature processes. Avtometriya, 2004, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 61–69. (in Russian)
5. Rykhlitski S.V., Shvets V.A., Spesivtsev E.V. Laser magne- toellipsometer. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta, 2009, no. 4, pp. 181–182. (in Russian)
6. Rykhlitski S.V., Shvets V.A., Spesivtsev E.V. Spectral magne- toellipsometer. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta, 2009, no. 5, pp. 166–167. (in Russian)
7. Shvets V.A., Kruchinin V.N., Rykhlitskii S.V., Prokop’ev V.Y., Uvarov N.F. Ellipsometric in situ diagnostics of the growth of porous anodic oxide films on aluminum.  Optics and Spectroscopy, 2015, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 277–283.
doi: 10.1134/S0030400X15020162
8. Spesivtsev E.V., Rykhlitski S.V., Aul’chenko N.A., Prokop’ev V.Y. Matrix ellipsometric complex IEC-2. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta, 2011, no. 6, pp. 137–138. (in Russian)
9. Prokop’ev V.Yu., Kus O.N., Ossovskii A.V. Small spacecraft standard CubeSat. Modern means of elimination. Siberian Journal of Science, 2014, no. 2(12), pp. 71–80. (in Russian)
10. Gorev V., Prokopyev V., Prokopyev Y., Sidorchuk A. Time-saving method of orbital thermal regime calculations of nanosatellites as exemplified by a 3U CubeSat. MATEC Web of Conference, 2018, vol. 158, pp. 01012. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815801012
11. Doroshkin A., Zadorozhny A., Kus O., Prokopyev V., Prokopyev Y. Laboratory testing of LoRa modulation for CubeSat radio communications. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 158, pp. 01008. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815801008
12. Doroshkin A., Zadorozhny A., Kus O., Prokopyev V., Prokopyev Y. Experimental Study of LoRa Modulation Immunity to Doppler Effect in CubeSat Radio Communications. IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 75721–75731. doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2019.2919274
 


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика