Menu
Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief
Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners
doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-1-40-51
DESIGN STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT OF ABERRATION CORRECTION PROCESS FOR LENS WITH HIGH COMPLEXITY INDEX
Read the full article
';
Article in Russian
For citation:
Abstract
For citation:
Livshits I.L., Tochilina T.V., Faehnle O., Volkova S.L. Design strategy and management of aberration correction process for lens with high complexity index. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40–51 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-1-40-51
Abstract
Subject of Research. The strategy of designing optical imaging systems is defined, which consists in combining various design methods and is based on the theory of structural and parametric synthesis, ensuring the presence of the necessary correction parameters in the original optical system. The control of the correction of residual aberrations by using the correction capabilities of the scheme is considered. The composition of the evaluation function, recommendations for automated aberration correction, calculation of tolerances for the manufacture of an optical system, as well as the decision-making procedure for choosing the best optical scheme option are proposed. Method. The strategy is based on the analysis of the properties of optical imaging systems and their classification, followed by the determination of the system complexity index, as well as on the classification of aberrations and the development of methods for their correction. Main Results. An algorithm is proposed for implementing the strategy based on understanding the properties of the optical system and its correction capabilities. Analysis of the design specification for determining the complexity index of the optical imaging system, the choice of the optimal scheme and the correction capabilities of the scheme are determined. The composition of the evaluation function is considered. The “default” function evaluation and the function compiled by the user are compared taking into account the recommendations proposed in this paper. Practical Relevance. The implementation of the proposed strategy creates conditions for reducing the design time, especially for systems of increased complexity with forced technical characteristics. An algorithm flowchart is presented, its parameters and correction capabilities are determined. Automated correction is carried out based on the received recommendations. The tolerances for manufacturing are calculated and the level of its manufacturability is determined.
Keywords: design strategy, optical systems, aberrations, aberration correction methods, evaluation function, correction, tolerances
Acknowledgements. The research was supported by People Program grants (Marie Curie Actions) of the Seventh European Union Framework Program: No. 608082 (Topic No. FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN “ADOPSYS”) and No. 288526 (Topic No. FP7-ICT-2011-7 “SMETHODS”).
References
Acknowledgements. The research was supported by People Program grants (Marie Curie Actions) of the Seventh European Union Framework Program: No. 608082 (Topic No. FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN “ADOPSYS”) and No. 288526 (Topic No. FP7-ICT-2011-7 “SMETHODS”).
References
1. Anitropova I.L. Simple method for computer-aided lens design with the elements of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of SPIE, 1992, vol. 1780, pp. 210–213. doi: 10.1117/12.142806
2. Livshits I.L., Vasilyev V.N. Q and A tutorial on optical design. Advanced Optical Technologies, 2013, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39. doi: 10.1515/aot-2012-0077
3. Dilworth D.C. Automatic lens optimization: Recent improvements. Proceedings of SPIE, 1986, vol. 554, pp. 191–196. doi: 10.1117/12.949224
4. Dilworth D. Lens Design. Automatic and quasi-autonomous computational methods and techniques. IOP Publishitg Ltd, 2018, 400 р. doi: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1611-8
5. Vasilev V.N., Livshitc I.L., Muromtcev D.I. Design Basics for Expert Lens Arrangement Systems. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2012, 209 p. (in Russian)
6. Dilworth D.C., Shafer D. Man versus machine: A lens design challenge. Proceedings of SPIE, 2013, vol. 8841, pp. 88410G. doi: 10.1117/12.2022871
7. Rusinov M.M. Optical Engineering. Leningrad, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1979, 488 p. (in Russian)
8. Rusinov M.M. Composition of Optical Systems. Leningrad, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1989, 383 p. (in Russian)
9. Shafer D. Optical design and the relaxation response. Proceedings of SPIE, 1987, vol. 766, pp. 91–99. doi: 10.1117/12.940196
10. Livshits I.L., Hou Z., Van Grol P., Shao Y., Van Turnhout M., Urbach H.P., Bociort F. Using saddle points for challenging optical design tasks. Proceedings of SPIE, 2014, vol. 9192, pp. 919204. doi: 10.1117/12.2061975
11. Hou Z., Livshits I.L., Bociort F. One-dimensional searches for finding new lens design solutions efficiently. Applied Optics, 2016, vol. 55, no. 36, pp. 10449–10456. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.010449
12. Livshits I.L., Glebovskyi A.S., Protsuto M.V., Volkova S.L. Interdisciplinary approach for simulation of starting points for optical and architectural design. Advanced Optical Technologies, 2019, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 135–144.
13. Livshits I.L., Dilworth D.C. Trends in optical design from 1988 to 2018... where to from here? Advanced Optical Technologies, 2018, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 335–341. doi: 10.1515/aot-2018-0025
14. Ezhova K.V., Zverev V.A., Tochilina T.V., Timoshtuk I. Fundamentals of concentric lens systems synthesis. Proceedings of SPIE, 2016, vol. 9947, pp. 994719. doi: 10.1117/12.2237784
15. Zverev V.A., Tochilina T.V. Aberration analysis of a compensation scheme to monitor second-order concave reflecting surfaces. Journal of Optical Technology, 2017, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 536–541. doi: 10.1364/JOT.84.000536
16. Zverev V.A., Timoschuk I.N., Tochilina T.V. Method for designing an optical system for a three-mirror flat-field anastigmat. Journal of Optical Technology, 2017, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 838–842. doi: 10.1364/JOT.84.000838
17. Dilworth D.C. Improved convergence with the pseudo-second- derivative (PSD) optimization method. Proceedings of SPIE, 1983, vol. 399, pp. 159–165. doi: 10.1117/12.935427
18. Karow H. Fabrication Methods for Precision Optics. Wiley, 2004, 768 р.
19. Livshits I.L., Faehnle O. Producibility analysis of lens system during optical design stage. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2020, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 625– 633.
20. Zorich N., Livshits I.L., Dilworth D., Okishev S.G. Design of an ultraviolet projection lens by using a global search algorithm and computer optimization. Advanced Optical Technologies, 2017, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 31–38.
21. Livshits I.L., Zoric N. A concept of ultraviolet lithography system and design of its rear part using artificial intelligence for starting design. Proc. 4th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology, PHOTOPTICS , 2016, pp. 84–88. doi: 10.5220/0005688500820086
22. Livshits I.L., Dilworth D.C. Practical tutorial: A simple strategy to start a pinhole lens design. Advanced Optical Technologies, 2015, vol. 4, no. 5-6, pp. 413–427. doi: 10.1515/aot-2015-0024
23. Bliedtner J., Gräfe G. Optiktechnologie: Grundlagen–Verfahren– Anwendungen–Beispiele. Hanser, 2010, 420 р. (in German)
