doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-4-515-524


Determination of dangerous driving behavior based on the use of information from wearable electronic devices

I. B. Lashkov


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:

Lashkov I.B. Determination of dangerous driving behavior based on the use of information from wearable electronic devices. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 515–524 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-4-515-524



Abstract
Monitoring the driver’s behavior in the cabin of a vehicle is an urgent task for modern automated driver support systems (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), which belong to the class of active safety systems. Existing research and solutions in the field of modern driver assistance systems are more focused on the use of electronic devices in the form of video cameras, lasers, and radars that provide measurement information about the driver in the cabin. However, the use of wearable electronic devices that measure the heart rate, electrocardiogram, user movements, and other indicators, allows one to obtain results about the driver’s dangerous behavior more accurately and reliably. The paper proposes an approach to detecting dangerous states in the driver’s behavior in the cabin of a vehicle based on the use of information from wearable electronic devices. The study shows that it is sufficient to use heart rate measurements passed from wearable electronic devices to detect dangerous states, such as aggression and stress. The developed mobile application on the Android platform allows detecting signs of aggression and stress in the driver’s behavior using data obtained from sensors of wearable electronic devices. When the driver shows dangerous behavior in the cabin, the mobile application warns the driver by vibrating the wearable electronic device and an audio signal played by the smartphone. The developed approach is tested on a data set collected in real driving conditions on public roads in the city and on country roads in various driving conditions. Detection of signs of aggression and stress in the driver’s behavior allows one to supplement information about the driver, and thereby improve the effectiveness of driver monitoring systems in the cabin of the vehicle, aimed at preventing and reducing the risk of road accidents and improving the skills of road users. The proposed approach can be used in combination with other technologies for monitoring driver behavior when building an intelligent driver support system.

Keywords: vehicle, driver, smartphone, sensors, wearable electronic device, monitoring, information processing

Acknowledgements. The study was carried out with the financial support of the RFBR within the scientific project No. 19-29-09081 (“Algorithms for Detecting Signs of Aggressive Behavior and Driver Stress”). The conceptual model of driver behavior monitoring was supported by the budget theme of the SPC RAS No. 0073-2019-0005. The development of the mobile application was supported by FASIE (the program “UMNIK”).

References
  1. Moody J., Bailey N., Zhao J. Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison. Safety Science, 2020, vol. 121, pp. 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.022
  2. Val-Calvo M., Álvarez-Sánchez J.R., Ferrández-Vicente J.M., Díaz-Morcillo A., Fernández-Jover E. Real-time multi-modal estimation of dynamically evoked emotions using EEG, heart rate and galvanic skin response. International Journal of Neural Systems, 2020, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2050013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065720500136
  3. Dementienko V., Yurov A., Ivanov I., Makaev D. Remote monitoring of the driver status as a means of improving transport safety. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, vol. 20, pp. 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.01.035
  4. Kashevnik A., Lashkov I., Ponomarev A., Teslya N., Gurtov A. Cloud-based driver monitoring system using a smartphone. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 6701–6715. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2975382
  5. Kashevnik A., Lashkov I., Gurtov A. Methodology and mobile application for driver behavior analysis and accident prevention. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2427–2436. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2918328
  6. Moslem S., Gul M., Farooq D., Celik E., Ghorbanzadeh O., Blaschke T. An integrated approach of best-worst method (BWM) and triangular fuzzy sets for evaluating driver behavior factors related to road safety. Mathematics, 2020, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030414
  7. Naqvi R.A., Arsalan M., Batchuluun G., Yoon H.S., Park K.R. Deep learning-based gaze detection system for automobile drivers using a NIR camera sensor. Sensors, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020456
  8. Dong N., Li Y., Gao Z., Ip W.H., Yung K.L. A WPCA-based method for detecting fatigue driving from EEG-Based Internet of Vehicles system. IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 124702–124711. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937914
  9. Jing D., Liu D., Zhang S., Guo Z. Fatigue driving detection method based on EEG analysis in low-voltage and hypoxia plateau environment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2020, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.03.008
  10. ElSherif A., Karaman A., Ahmed O., Magdy O., Shouman R., El-Noumier R., Hamed A.M., Eldawlatly H., Eldawlatly S. Monitoring and predicting driving performance using EEG activity. Proc. 15th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), 2020, pp. 9334574. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES51560.2020.9334574
  11. Park S.J., Hong S., Kim D., Hussain I., Seo Y. Intelligent in-car health monitoring system for elderly drivers in connected car. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2019, vol. 823, pp. 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_4
  12. Hamza Cherif F., Hamza Cherif L., Benabdellah M., Nassar G. Monitoring driver health status in real time. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2020, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 035110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5098308
  13. Chhabra R., Verma S., Rama Krishna C. Detecting aggressive driving behavior using mobile smartphone. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2019, vol. 46, pp. 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1217-5_49
  14. Warren J., Lipkowitz J., Sokolov V. Clusters of driving behavior from observational smartphone data. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2019, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2919516
  15. Myslivecek J. The basis of the stress reaction. Current Science, 2015, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 716–726.
  16. Munla N., Khalil M., Shahin A., Mourad A. Driver stress level detection using HRV analysis. Proc. of the International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME), 2015, pp. 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME.2015.7323251
  17. Sterling P., Eyer J. Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health. Hoboken, USA, Wiley, 1988, pp. 629–649.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика