Menu
Publications
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief
Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners
doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2025-25-5-817-824
Geometric modeling and compensation of cutting tool positioning errors for eliminating protrusion in large-radius spherical surface machining
Read the full article
Article in English
For citation:
Abstract
For citation:
Rizki M.A., Fedosov Yu.V., Afanasiev M.Y., Krylova A.A. Geometric modeling and compensation of cutting tool positioning errors for eliminating protrusion in large-radius spherical surface machining. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2025, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 817–824. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2025-25-5-817-824
Abstract
The production of optical components with a large radius of spherical surfaces requires exceptionally high surface profile accuracy. Minor deviations in the positioning of the cutting tool caused by factors, such as mechanical backlash, thermal deformation, and incorrect tool positioning, can result in dimensional errors of the machined surface, particularly in the form of protrusions that indicate processing defects. Despite a wide range of studies focused on tool wear and general machining errors, insufficient attention has been given to the geometric modeling and correction of defects caused by tool positioning errors. This study presents a comprehensive approach to geometrically modeling the impact of cutting tool positioning errors on the machined surface profile. A mathematical model has been developed to model the interaction between the tool and the spherical surface, enabling precise estimation of the radial machining error. Based on these data, a new error compensation method is proposed, allowing for the correction of errors by modifying the tool movement trajectory. The proposed model accurately predicts the formation and characteristics of protrusions resulting from tool displacement during the machining of spherical surfaces with a large radius. Implementation of the compensation method significantly reduces the defect rate, improves geometric accuracy, and decreases the need for additional processing. Addressing defects caused by positioning errors enables the proposal of a new method that has not previously been considered in precision machining research. The proposed model and tool positioning error compensation method offer an effective and practical solution for improving the surface profile accuracy of optical components, thereby enhancing the precision and efficiency of manufacturing processes. The proposed method contributes to the advancement of high- precision optical component manufacturing with minimal post-processing costs, providing a novel approach in the fields of instrument engineering and precision mechanical engineering.
Keywords: machining errors, tool wear, precision manufacturing, concave surface milling, calibration techniques, mathematical modeling
Acknowledgements. The work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Agreement No. 075-11-2023-015, 10.02.2023, “Creation of high-tech serial production of energy-efficient synchronous electric motors with integrated intelligent position sensor and self-diagnosis functions for robotics and digital automation systems”.
References
Acknowledgements. The work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Agreement No. 075-11-2023-015, 10.02.2023, “Creation of high-tech serial production of energy-efficient synchronous electric motors with integrated intelligent position sensor and self-diagnosis functions for robotics and digital automation systems”.
References
1. Bey M., Bendifallah M., Kader S., Boukhalfa K. A new approach for finishing free-form surfaces based on local shapes. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2014, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2013.838323
2. Vyboishchik A.V. Modelling topology of freeform surfaces with ball-end milling. Procedia Engineering, 2016, vol. 150, pp. 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.103
3. Mo J., Chang X., Renqing D., Zhang J., Liao L., Luo S. Design, fabrication, and performance evaluation of a concave lens array on an aspheric curved surface. Optics Express, 2022, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 33241–33258. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.471055
4. Juiña L.C., Dávalos E.J., Landazurí D.S., Guaño S.E., Moreno N.V. Roughness analysis of a concave surface as a function of machining parameters and strategies for AISI 420 steel. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, vol. 49, part 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.477
5. Yu Z., Zhi-Tong C., Yun Z., Tao N. Tool positioning method for achieving double-point contact in flank milling of a concave surface with a barrel cutter. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, vol. 93, no. 5-8, pp. 1791–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0472-1
6. Gok A., Gologlu C., Demirci H.I. Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, vol. 69, no. 5-8, pp. 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x
7. Chen W.F., Lai H.Y., Chen C.K. Design and NC machining of concave-arc ball-end milling cutters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2002, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200140
8. Chen W.F., Lai H.Y., Chen C.K. A precision tool model for concave cone-end milling cutters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2001, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700170033
9. Kang Z., Fu Y., Chen Y., Ji J., Fu H., Wang S., Li R.Experimental investigation of concave and convex micro-textures for improving anti-adhesion property of cutting tool in dry finish cutting. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 2018, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0060-3
10. Chen Y. Yao L. Study on a method of CNC form milling for the concave convex arc line gear. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, vol. 99, no. 9-12. pp. 2327–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2566-9
11. Zhang D., Wang Z., Yao L., Xie D. Mathematical modeling and machining of the internal double-arc spiral bevel gear by finger milling cutters for the nutation drive mechanism. Machines, 2022, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080663
12. Schwertz K. An introduction to the optics manufacturing process. OptoMechanics (OPTI 521) Report, 2008.
13. Fomin A.A., Gusev V.G., Sattarova Z.G. Geometrical errors of surfaces milled with convex and concave profile tools. Solid State Phenomena, 2018, vol. 284, pp. 281–288. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.284.281
14. Xie M., Pan Y., An Z., Huang S., Dong M. Review on surface polishing methods of optical parts. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, vol. 2022, pp. 8723269. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8723269
15. Fan M., Bi C., Liu X., Yue C., Hu D. Effects of tool structure factor, cutting orientations, and cutting parameters of double-arc milling cutter on cutting force. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2024, vol. 134, no. 9-10, pp. 4701–4716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14375-0

