Menu
Publications
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief
Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners
doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2026-26-2-315-323
Detection of network anomalies in the Internet of Things environment using modified statistical criteria and ensemble methods
Read the full article
Article in Russian
For citation:
Abstract
For citation:
Bazhayev N. Detection of network anomalies in the Internet of Things environment using modified statistical criteria and ensemble methods. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2026, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 315–323 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2026-26-2-315-323
Abstract
The rapid growth of Internet of Things (IoT) devices is accompanied by increasingly sophisticated security threats, including DDoS attacks, brute-force authentication attempts, and large-scale packet flooding. Traditional statistical methods for anomaly detection exhibit low robustness to noise and fail to account for the dynamic nature of IoT traffic. This results in a higher rate of false positives and reduced accuracy in attack identification. This paper proposes a hybrid approach to IoT traffic anomaly detection consisting of three stages: preliminary filtering of suspicious packets using a modified Z-score adjusted for sample size; adaptive probabilistic attack risk assessment based on a Bayesian classifier with a weighting function that amplifies the impact of significant deviations; final classification using an ensemble of models (Random Forest, SVM, and LSTM), which ensures robustness to noise and enables the identification of nonlinear dependencies in the data. Experimental evaluation on the UNSW-NB15 dataset, which includes both normal traffic and diverse attack scenarios, demonstrated that the proposed method achieved Precision = 89.1 %, Recall = 90.3 %, and F1-score = 89.9 %. The best results were observed in the analysis of message interval anomalies (up to 92 % accuracy), confirming the effectiveness of temporal features. The method outperformed classical algorithms (Rosner Test, Holt-Winters) and achieved comparable accuracy to autoencoder while requiring significantly fewer computational resources. The hybrid architecture enables adaptation to diverse attack types and reduces false alarms through the combination of statistical filtering and ensemble classification. Its noise resilience and low computational complexity make the method suitable for deployment in resource-constrained IoT environments. Future research directions include the integration of federated learning for decentralized anomaly detection and the use of self-adaptive neural architectures for predicting complex attack scenarios.
Keywords: information security, IoT security, IoT networks, anomaly detection, intrusion detection, modified Z-score, Bayesian classifier, ensemble learning, machine learning, traffic monitoring
Acknowledgements. This research has been funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP25794699).
References
Acknowledgements. This research has been funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP25794699).
References
1. Stetsiuk M., Anikin V., Pyrch O., Kozelskiy O., Salem A.B.M. Method of detecting anomalies in IoT device traffic based on statistical analysis using the modified Z score. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2025, vol. 3963, pp. 284–298.
2. Wang J., Yu L., Lui J.C.S., Luo X. Modern DDoS threats and countermeasures: insights into emerging attacks and detection strategies. arXiv, 2025. arXiv:2502.19996. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19996
3. Alam M.N., Laxmi V., Sharma A., Dangi S. Machine learning: key algorithms, practical applications, and current research directions. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2025, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 12–46. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/ijeee-v12i4p102
4. Chen Y., Peng Y., Tang J., Camilleri T., Camilleri K., Kong W., et al. EEG-based affective brain-computer interfaces: recent advancements and future challenges. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2025, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 031004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ade290
5. Thakur P., Kaur N., Aggarwal N., Singh S. A comprehensive review of unimodal and multimodal emotion detection: datasets, approaches, and limitations. Expert Systems, 2025, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. e70103. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70103
6. Rai N., Grover J. Analysis of crypto module in RIOT OS using Frama-C. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2024, vol. 80, no. 13, pp. 18521–18543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06171-0
7. Dymova H. Study of cryptographic security of computer networks. Computer-Integrated Technologies: Education, Science, Production, 2025, no. 57, pp. 15–19. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2524-0560-2024-57-02
8. Alaba F.A., Othman M., Hashem I.A.T., Alotaibi F. Internet of Things security: a survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2017, vol. 88, pp. 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.002
9. Sicari S., Rizzardi A., Grieco L.A., Coen-Porisini A. Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: the road ahead. Computer Networks, 2015, vol. 76, pp. 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008
10. Roman R., Najera P., Lopez J. Securing the Internet of Things. Computer, 2011, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2011.291
11. Jing Q., Vasilakos A.V., Wan J., Lu J., Qiu D. Security of the Internet of Things: perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 2014, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2481–2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0761-7
12. Yang Y., Wu L., Yin G., Li L., Zhao H. A survey on security and privacy issues in Internet-of-Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2017, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2694844
13. Granjal J., Monteiro E., Silva J.S. Security for the Internet of Things: a survey of existing protocols and open research issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2015, vol. 17, no. 3,pp. 1294–1312.
14. Weber R.H. Internet of Things – New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 2010, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008
15. Mosenia A., Jha N.K. A comprehensive study of security of Internet-of-Things. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2016.2606384
16. Khan M.A., Salah K. IoT security: review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, vol. 82, pp. 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022
17. Savenko O., Lysenko S., Kryschuk A. Multi-agent based approach of botnet detection in computer systems. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2012, vol. 291, pp. 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31217-5_19
18. Dong Z. Artificial Intelligence for Multimodal Data Analysis and Applications: Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2025.
19. Ahmed M., Mahmood A.N., Hu J. A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.016

