Article in Russian
For citation: Glushchenko F.A., Borsych W., Wermann J., Colombo A.W. Development of educational platform for Industry 4.0 production process study.
Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2018, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 554–560 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2018-18-3-554-560
Abstract
Subject of Research. We propose educational platform created on the basis of the automated production in the Industry 4.0 concept. The interaction of automated production area components is described. The paper describes the process of new components integration into a standardized architectural model. Method. While creating an automated production area, a modern service-oriented architectural model is used, which describes the production process both from the life cycle side and at different levels of the hierarchy, as well as the interaction levels of the components of this production. The basis of the production is a single-board Raspberry Pi computer with a server being started on it for data exchange between the database and the engraving site. Main Results. A model was designed for the next stage of production supplementing by a set of 3D printers. Interfaces between the components of the automated production were also identified. Practical Relevance. The created production area gives the possibility to get acquainted with the basis of the Industry 4.0 concept. The developed model will be implemented for training students to work with modern industrial automation. In addition, the architecture of the created production area provides an opportunity to develop new automation programs, introduce additional production components, and study their interaction with existing ones.
Keywords: industrial cyber physical systems, Industry 4.0, industrial automation, education, production system, service-oriented architecture
Acknowledgements. This work has been supported by the The Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, DAAD and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Assignment No. 9.9951.2017/DAAD for partial financial support of the abroad research studies).
References
1. Barry D.K. Web Services, Service-Oriented Architectures, and Cloud Computing. 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2013, 244 p.
2. Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C. Factors affecting ERP system implementation effectiveness.
Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2011, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 60–78.doi:
10.1108/17410391211192161
3. ElMaraghy H., ElMaraghy W. Learning integrated product and manufacturing systems.
Procedia CIRP, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 19–24. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.222
4. Rentzos L., Mavrikios D., Chryssolouris G. A two-way knowledge interaction in manufacturing education: the teaching factory.
Procedia CIRP, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 31–35. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.082
5. Faller C., Feldmuller D. Industry 4.0 learning factory for regional SMEs.
Procedia CIRP, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 88–91. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.117
6. Hummel V., Hyra K., Ranz F., Schuhmacher J. Competence development for the holistic design of collaborative work systems in the Logistics Learning Factory.
Procedia CIRP, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 76–81. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.111
7. Muschard B., Seliger G. Realization of a learning environment to promote sustainable value creation in areas with insufficient infrastructure.
Procedia CIRP, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 70–75. doi:
10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.095
8. Candido G., Colombo A.W., Barata J., Jammes F. Service-oriented infrastructure to support the deployment of evolvable production systems.
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2011, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 759–767. doi:
10.1109/TII.2011.2166779
9. Colombo A.W., Bangemann T., Karnouskos S. et al
. Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems: The IMC-AESOP Approach. Springer, 2014, 245 p. doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-05624-1
10. Khaitan S.K., McCalley J.D. Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: a survey.
IEEE Systems Journal, 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 350–365. doi:
10.1109/JSYST.2014.2322503
11. Boardman J., Sauser B. System of Systems - the meaning of.
Proc. IEEE/SMC Int. Conf. on System of Systems Engineering. Los Angeles, USA, 2006. doi:
10.1109/SYSOSE.2006.1652284
13. AlShahwan F., Moessner K. Providing SOAP web services and restful web services from mobile hosts.
Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Internet and Web Applications and Services, ICIW. Barcelona, Spain, 2010, pp. 174–179. doi:
10.1109/ICIW.2010.33
14. Leitao P., Colombo A.W., Karnouskos S. Industrial automation based on cyber-physical systems technologies: Prototype implementations and challenges.
Computers in Industry, 2016, vol. 81, pp. 11–25. doi:
10.1016/j.compind.2015.08.004
15. Bangemann T. et al. State of the art in industrial automation. In
Industrial Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, 2014, pp. 23–47. doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-05624-1_2
16. Jamshidi M. System of systems – innovations for 21
st century.
Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on. Industrial and Information Systems. Kharagpur, India, 2008, pp. 6–7. doi:
10.1109/ICIINFS.2008.4798321
17. Flatt H. et al. Analysis of the Cyber-Security of industry 4.0 technologies based on RAMI 4.0 and identification of requirements.
Proc. Int. Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Berlin, 2016, 4 p. doi:
10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733634
18. Hankel M., Rexroth B. The Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0). ZVEI, 2015, 2 p.
Zarte M., Pechmann A., Wermann J., Gosewehr F., Colombo A.W. Building an Industry 4.0-compliant lab environment to demonstrate connectivity between shop floor and IT levels of an enterprise.
Proc. IECON. Florence, Italy, 2016, pp. 6590–6595. doi:
10.1109/IECON.2016.7792956
';
