COMPARISON OF APPROACHES TO UNKNOWN PARAMETERS IDENTIFICATION IN GYRO DRIFT MODEL

Ivanov D.P., Litvinenko Yu. A., Tupysev V.A. Comparison of approaches to unknown parameters identification in gyro drift model. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2018, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 887–893 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2018-18-5-887-893

The paper proposes a model of floated gyro drift, used in a platform-based inertial navigation system, which takes into account temperature effects. We consider a problem of unknown parameters identification in a mathematical model of floated gyro drift. The presence of nonlinearity in the dynamics equations is expected. It is proposed to solve the formulated identification problem by Kalman-type filter application. This filter is characterized by the linearization point variation in course of solving the problem. The problem is solved for the gyro drift model which takes into account the temperature effect. The results of the model unknown parameters identification are compared using two algorithms. The first proposed algorithm is based on Kalman-like filter and the second one is based on the least squares method. The analysis of simulation results showed that the accuracy of unknown parameters identification by the algorithm based on linearized Kalman filter is commensurable with the algorithm based on the least squares method. However, linearized Kalman filter is efficient in solving the problem of identification of a gyro error model represented by combination of a few random processes.

1. Vaisgant I.B., Litvinenko Yu.A. Errors in the development of navigation parameters by platform inertial systems of the middle class of accuracy, depending on the latitude of the place. Izvestiya vuzov. Priborostroenie, 2002, no. 9. (in Russian)

2. Stepanov O.A., Koshaev D.A. Universal MATLAB programs for investigating a potential accuracy and sensitivity of linear nonstationary filtering algorithms. Gyroscopy and Navigation, 2004, no. 2, pp. 81–93. (in Russian)

3. Stepanov O.A. Optimal and sub-optimal filtering in integrated navigation systems. In Aerospace Navigation Systems. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, pp. 244–298. doi: 10.1002/9781119163060.ch8

4. Markley F.L., Crassidis J.L. Fundamentals of Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. NY, Springer, 2014, 486 p.

5. Grewal M.S., Andrews A.P., Bartone C.G. Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration. 3^rd ed. NY, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013, 608 p.

6. Stepanov O.A. Application of the Theory of Nonlinear Filtering in Problems of Processing Navigation Information. 3^rd ed. St. Petersburg, TsNII Electropribor, 2003, 370 p. (in Russian)

7. Tupysev V.A., Stepanov O.A., Loparev A.V., Litvinenko Y.A. Guaranteed estimation in the problems of navigation information processing. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Control Applications. St. Petersburg, Russia, 2009, pp. 1672–1677. doi: 10.1109/CCA.2009.5281081

8.  Polushkin A.V., Nazarov I.A., Slistin I.V., Chernov S.A., Borchaninov D.G., Nakhov S.F., Kazakov A.S., Vinogradov I.E., Plotnikov P.K., Zakharov Yu. A. Automatic rotary device for verification of the accuracy characteristics of platformless inertial navigation system. Proc. 25^th St. Petersburg Int. Conf. on Integrated Navigation System. St. Petersburg, Russia, 2018, pp. 432–437. doi: 10.23919/icins.2018.8405922

9. Gromov D.S. Thermal mode of a two-rane floating gyro. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2012, no. 3, pp. 119–123. (in Russian)

10. Dranitsyna E.V. Calibration of the Precision SINS Measuring Module on Fiber Optic Gyroscopes. Dis. PhD Tech. Sci. St. Petersburg, 2016, 89 p. (in Russian)

11. Esipenko I.A., Lykov D.A. Mathematical model of thermal drift of a fiber-optic gyroscope and its experimental verification. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Series Instrument Engineering, 2017, no. 5, pp. 31–46. (in Russian)doi: 10.18698/0236-3933-2017-5-31-46

12. Stepanov O.A., Dolnakova A.S., Sokolov A.I. Analysis of the potential accuracy of estimating the parameters of random processes in problems of navigation data processing. Proc. 12^th All-Russian Meeting on Control Problems. Moscow, 2014, pp. 3730–3740. (in Russian)

13. Stepanov O.A., Motorin A.V. A comparison of identification methods for the error models of sensors based on Allan variations and nonlinear filtering algorithms. Proc. 21^st St. Petersburg Conf. Integrated Navigation Systems. St. Petersburg, 2014, pp. 98–103. (in Russian)

14. Tupysev V.A., Kruglova N.D., Motorin A.V. Suboptimal algorithms identifying the navigation sensor errors described by Markov process. Gyroscopy and Navigation, 2016, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 55–62. (in Russian) doi: 10.17285%2F0869-7035.2016.24.3.055-062

15. Hernandez-Gonzalez M., Basin M., Stepanov O. Discrete-time state estimation for stochastic polynomial systems over polynomial observations. International Journal of General Systems, 2018, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 512–528. doi: 10.1080/03081079.2018.1461098

16. Emel'yantsev G.I., Stepanov A.P. Integrated Inertial-Satellite Systems of Orientation and Navigation. St. Petersburg, TsNII Electropribor, 2016, 294 p. (in Russian)

17. Sarkka S. Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing. CambridgeUniversityPress,2013,252 p.

Ivanov D.P. Litvinenko Yu.A. Comparison of suboptimal algorithms for determining unknown parameters of the gyroscope escape model. Proc. 20^th Conf. of Young Scientists Navigation and Traffic Control. St. Petersburg, Russia, TsNII Electropribor, 2018, 394 p.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License