doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-4-689-696


MODIFICATION METHOD OF SPACED REPETITION SEQUENCE BASED ON USER’S ONLINE ACTIVITY 

I. E. Mikhailov, P. . Balakshin


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:

Mikhailov I.E., Balakshin P.V. Modification method of spaced repetition sequence based on user’s online activity. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 689–696 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-4-689-696



Abstract

Subject of Research. The paper describes a foreign language learning process based on the spaced repetition approach and also considers encountered problems. Online services and other software products applying the given approach are reviewed; advantages and disadvantages are defined. Method. Evaluation of word priority in a user’s personal dictionary is initialized by activity data on the Internet. Two queues are stored on a per-user basis: the queue of words for repeating and the queue of words for learning. The words’ priority and the intervals between them in the repetition queue are evaluated by modified formula of SuperMemo method, where memorization factor can take only predefined values. Main Results. The modification method of spaced repetition sequence based on the user’s activity on the Internet is proposed. This method tends to suppress the shortcomings of modern online services for learning foreign languages and speed up educational process. At this, actual words for learning are detected automatically and already known ones are removed from training. One of the most significant features of the given method is the overcoming of isolation of modern online educational platforms. An application server and a browser extension have been developed on the basis of the presented method.  Practical Relevance. The proposed method can be used in the other areas where human activity is associated with the necessity to memorize a large number of new terms.


Keywords: spaced repetition, foreign language, educational systems, memorization, education, browser extension

Acknowledgements. The paper is recommended for publication as a result of the report at the Seventh Congress of Young Scientists.

References
  1. Rivers W.M. Teaching Foreign Language Skills Rev Ed. University of Chicago Press, 1981, 576 p. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226518855.001.0001
  2. Cook V. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching.5th ed. Routledge, 2016, 344 p. doi: 10.4324/9781315883113
  3. Ebbinghaus H. Memory. A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. NYC, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1913, 124 p. doi: 10.1037/10011-000
  4. Ausubel D.P., Youssef M. The effect of spaced repetition on meaningful retention. The Journal of General Psychology, 1965, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 147–150. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1965.9711263
  5. Spitzer H.F. Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 641–657. doi: 10.1037/h0063404
  6. Glenberg A.M., Lehmann T.S. Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 1980, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 528–538. doi: 10.3758/bf03213772
  7. Janiszewski C., Noel H., Sawyer A.G. A meta-analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: Implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 138–149. doi: 10.1086/374692
  8. Kornell N. Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2009, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1297–1317. doi: 10.1002/acp.1537
  9. Yoonhee J. et al. Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 962–975. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.638079
  10. Łuczak A. Using memrise in legal English teaching. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2017, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 141–152. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2017-0009
  11. Alqahtani M. The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2015, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 21–34. doi: 10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002
  12. Dewaele J.-M. On emotions in foreign language learning and use. The Language Teacher, 2015, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 13–15.
  13. Samsonov E. Enhancing learning through Internet technology. Actual problems of foreign languages teaching in higher education of the Republic of Belarus - 2014. Mogilyov, 2015, pp. 63–65.
  14. Madrid D., García Sánchez E. Content-based second language teaching. Present and Future Trends in TEFL. Universidad de Almería, 2001, pp. 101–134.
  15. Petrova A., Podzygun O. Implementation of information and communication technologies in teaching a foreign language for professional communication. In Professional Competency of Modern Specialist: Means of Formation, Development and Improvement. Warsaw, BMT Eridia, 2018, pp. 163–176.
  16. Wozniak P. SuperMemo 2004. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 2007, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–12.
  17. Rohrer D. et al. The effect of overlearning on long-term retention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2005, vol. 19, pp. 361–374. doi: 10.1002/acp.1083
  18. Sharples M. et al. Mobile and accessible learning for MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2015, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.5334/jime.ai
  19. Hadley A.O. Teaching Language in Context. 3rd ed. Heinle & Heinle, 2001, 512 p.
  20. Wozniak P.A. Optimization of Learning. Master Thesis. University of Technology in Poznan, 1990.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика