ENG
РУС
Search
Menu
About the Edition
Open Access Statement
Editorial Board
Editorial Policy
Editorial Ethics
Rules for peer-review
Rules for presentation of papers
Forms of Submitted Documents
Recommendations for the Design of References to Our Journal
Editorial Staff
Information for Subscribers
Summaries of the Issue
List of Authors
Issues
Publishers license agreement
Procedure of work with personal data
Publications
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief

Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners













































doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2022-22-6-1226-1236

Modeling and simulation ofone- and two-row six-bladed ducted fans

S. Y. Dudnikov, M. P. Bulat, L. O. Vokin, P. N. Kuznetsov, P. S. Chernyshov


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:
Dudnikov S.Yu., Bulat M.P., Vokin L.O., Kuznetsov P.N., Chernyshov P.S. Modeling and simulation of one- and two-row six-bladed ducted fans. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2022, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1226–1236 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2022-22-6-1226-1236


Abstract
The problem of simulation of efficient ducted fan type propulsors is considered. From experience of operation of twin blades in fantails of helicopters, it is known that this configuration creates less noise compared to a uniform arrangement of the blades around the circumference. However, the flow behind such fan is less uniform than that of a conventional ducted fan. For multicopter-type unmanned aircraft and air taxis, the key problem is flight in take-off and landing modes as well as acoustic and vortex fields created by propulsors in these modes. The decrease in the noise level in propellers with twin blades can potentially be accompanied by an increase in non-stationary vortex effects on the aircraft as well as a decrease in specific thrust. The objectives were to develop a method for simulation of ducted fan propellers in the takeoff and landing mode, to determine the optimal angle between the blades, and to compare a ducted fan with twin X-shaped blades to conventional blade position. Turbulent flows were calculated using transient Reynold-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, complemented by SST turbulence model, and large eddy simulation with WALE subgrid viscosity model. The calculations used the modification γ–Reθ Transition SST of the Langtry-Menter turbulence model, where there are relations for the intermittency criterion, which made it possible to consider the laminar-turbulent transition and the appearance of thin laminar separation bubbles that affect both the thrust of the propeller and the non-uniformity of the flow behind it. Testing was carried out on four-bladed propellers according to the known results of the TsAGI reference experiments. Testing of the γ–Reθ Transition SST Langtry-Menter turbulence model showed that it reproduces the dependence of the thrust coefficient and power factor on the blade angle better than the standard SST model. Calculations have shown that there is a clearly defined optimum angle between the paired blades. A comparison of three-bladed, six-bladed single and six-bladed propellers with twin blades showed that the latter option has slightly better thrust characteristics and creates a significantly lower noise level on the ground. The studied characteristics of ducted fans demonstrate the prospects for the use of propellers with twin blades in aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing. The developed numerical method can be directly used for industrial calculations of propellers and fans.

Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle, unmanned aircraft, ducted fan, modeling and simulation, optimization, fenestron

Acknowledgements. This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the course of the project “Fundamental bases of mechanics, control and management systems for unmanned aircraft systems with shaping structures deeply integrated with propulsion systems and unique properties not used today in manned aviation”, No. FEFM-2020-0001.

References
  1. Chovancová A., Fico T., Chovanec L., Hubinský P. Mathematical modelling and parameter identification of quadrotor (a survey). Procedia Engineering, 2014, vol. 96, pp. 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.139
  2. Ostroukhov S.P. Aerodynamics of Aircraft Propellers and Annular Circular Propellers. Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2014, 328 p. (in Russian)
  3. Buzikin O.G., Kazakov A.V., Shustov A.V. Numerical simulation of the aerodynamic performance of a micro air vehicle. TSAGI Science Journal. 2010, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1615/TsAGISciJ.v41.i5.40
  4. Nazarov D., Kondryakova A. Analisys of the flow past the screw with the use of numericaland experimental simulation. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018, vol. 20, no. 4-1, pp. 70–75. (in Russian)
  5. Rumsey C.L., Biedron R., Farassat F., Spence P. Ducted-fan engine acoustic predictions using a Navier-Stokes code. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, vol. 213, no. 4, pp. 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.1519
  6. Reboul G., Polacsek C., Lewy S., Heib S. Aeroacoustic computation of ducted-fan broadband noise using LES data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 3539. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2934519
  7. Myers L., Rhee W., Mclaughlin D. Aeroacoustics of vertical lift ducted rotors. Proc. of the 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2009, pp. 2009-3333. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-3333
  8. Astley R., Sugimoto R., Achunche I., Kewin M., Mustafi P., Deane E. A review of CAA for fan duct propagation and radiation, with application to liner optimization. Procedia Engineering, 2010, vol. 6, pp. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.09.016
  9. Malgoezar A.M., Vieira A., Snellen M., Simons D.G., Veldhuis L.L. Experimental characterization of noise radiation from a ducted propeller of an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2019, vol. 18, no. 4-5, pp. 372–391 https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X19852952
  10. Zhang T., Barakos G.N. Review on ducted fans for compound rotorcraft. The Aeronautical Journal, 2020, vol. 124, no. 1277, pp. 941–974. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.164
  11. Akturk A., Shavalikul A., Camci C. PIV measurements and computational study of a 5-inch ducted fan for V/STOL UAV applications. Proc. of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009, pp. 2009-332. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-332
  12. Akturk A., Camci C. Experimental and computational assessment of a ducted-fan rotor flow model. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 885–897. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031562
  13. Yilmaz S., Erdem D., Kavsaoǧlu M. Effects of duct shape on a ducted propeller performance. Proc. of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2013, pp. 2013–0803. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-803
  14. Akturk A., Camci C. Tip clearance investigation of a ducted fan used in VTOL unmanned aerial vehicles. Part I: Baseline experiments and computational validation. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 021004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023468
  15. Xu H.-Y., Xing S.-L., Ye Z.-Y. Numerical study of ducted-fan lip stall suppression based on inflatable leading lip cell. Procedia Engineering, 2015, vol. 126, pp. 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.202
  16. Biava M., Barakos G.N. Optimisation of ducted propellers for hybrid air vehicles using high-fidelity CFD. The Aeronautical Journal, 2016, vol. 120, no. 1232, pp. 1632–1657. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.78
  17. Chen J., Li L., Huang G., Xiang X. Numerical investigations of ducted fan aerodynamic performance with tip-jet. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 78, pp. 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.016
  18. Ohanian O.J., Karni E.D., Londenberg W.K., Gelhausen P.A., Inman D.J. Ducted-fan force and moment control via steady and synthetic jets. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 514–526
  19. Mojzyh E.I., Zavalov O.A., Kuznetsov A.V. Experimental investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of unmanned aerial vehicle with lifted system of shrouded rotor. Trudy MAI, 2012, no. 50, pp. 11. (i
  20. Dehaeze F., Barakos G.N. Hovering rotor computations using an aeroelastic blade model. The Aeronautical Journal, 2012, vol. 116, no. 1180, pp. 621–649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000007107
  21. Abalakin I.V., Bakhvalov P.A., Bobkov V.G., Kozubskaya T.K., Anikin V.A Numerical simulation of aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of rotor in ring. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie, 2015, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 125–144. (in Rusian)
  22. Abalakin I.V., Anikin V.A., Bakhvalov P.A., Bobkov V.G., Kozubskaya T.K., Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic and acoustical properties of a shrouded rotor. Fluid Dynamics, 2016, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 419–433. 
  23. Dehaeze F., Barakos G.N., Kusyumov A.N., Kusyumov S.A., Mikhailov S.A. Exploring the detached-eddy simulation for main rotor flows. Russian Aeronautics, 2018, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 37–44. 
  24. Golovkin M.A., Kochish S.I., Kritsky B.S. Calculation procedure of aerodynamic characteristics of the combined carrying system of the aircraft. Trudy MAI, 2012, no. 55, pp. 5. (in Russian)
  25. Kopiev V.F., Titarev V.A., Belyaev I.V. Development of a methodology for propeller noise calculation on high-performance computer. TSAGI Science Journal, 2014, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1615/TsAGISciJ.2014011857
  26. Costes M., Renaud T., Rodriguez B. Rotorcraft simulations: a challenge for CFD. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2012, vol. 26, no. 6-8, pp. 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2012.726710
  27. Costes M., Renaud T., Rodriguez B., Reboul G. Application of vorticity confinement to rotor wake simulations. International Journal of Engineering Systems, Modelling and Simulation, 2012, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 102–112. 
  28. Popov N.I., Emelianova O.V., Jatsun S.F. Modelling of dynamics of flight of a quadrotor helicopter. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii, 2014, no. 4(13), pp. 69–75.
  29. Kanatnikov A. N., Akopyan K. R. The plane motion control of the quadrocopter. Mathematics and Mathematical Modelling, 2015, no. 2, pp. 23–36. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.7463/mathm.0215.0789477
  30. Shydakov V.I. Ground effect on aerodynamic characteristics of aerial vehicle with lifted system of shrouded rotor. Trudy MAI, 2011, no. 49, pp. 24. (in Russian)
  31. Volkov K. Numerical analysis of Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes. Handbook on Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Analysis. Nova Science, 2016, pp. 365–442.
  32. Volkov K. Multigrid and preconditioning techniques in CFD applications. CFD Techniques and Thermo-Mechanics Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 83–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70945-1_6
  33. Suvorov A.S., Korotin P.I., Sokov E.M. Finite element method for simulating noise emission generated by inhomogeneities of bodies moving in a turbulent fluid flow. Acoustical Physics, 2018, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 778–788. 
  34. Spalart P.R., Allmaras S.R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Proc. of the 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2992, pp. 1992-0439. 
  35. Menter F.R. Zonal two-equation k-ωturbulence models for aerodynamic flows. Proc. of the 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, 1993, pp. 1993-2906. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2906
  36. Menter F.R., Langtry R., Volker S. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2006, vol. 77, no. 1-4, pp. 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2025 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика