ENG
РУС
Search
Menu
About the Edition
Open Access Statement
Editorial Board
Editorial Policy
Editorial Ethics
Rules for peer-review
Rules for presentation of papers
Forms of Submitted Documents
Recommendations for the Design of References to Our Journal
Editorial Staff
Information for Subscribers
Summaries of the Issue
List of Authors
Issues
Publishers license agreement
Procedure of work with personal data
Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief

Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners













































doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2023-23-4-711-719

An enhanced AES-GCM based security protocol for securing the IoT communication

A. Feroz Khan, S. Kalpana Devi, K. Rama Devi


Read the full article  ';
Article in English

For citation:
Feroz Khan A.B., Kalpana Devi S., Rama Devi K. An enhanced AES-GCM based security protocol for securing the IoT communication. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2023, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 711–719. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2023-23-4-711-719


Abstract
In the recent years, the devices in Internet of Things (IoT) are growing exponentially due to the emergence of many sophisticated applications. This tremendous growth leads to serious security challenges and the devices of Wireless Sensor Networks should be protected from various attacks. IoT can be configured dynamically without fixed infrastructure and the devices are communicated with one another in an Ad-hoc manner. The work presents the classification of various DDoS attacks in the IoT environment and provides a solution for replay attack. All variations of DDoS attacks are modeled using UML based activity modeling. This clearly understands the behavior of each version of attacks and their performance in the environment. The modeling also helps to construct a solution to prevent this attack from its execution. The work also proposed a trust based protocol for replay attacks which allows the attack inside the network and blocks it after identifying the attack based on its specific behavior. The network performance is improved after implementing this proposed protocol inside the network with help of simulation under realistic conditions. The performance metrics considered in the work are energy, packet loss, computational time and throughput. The paper compares the performance with the state-of-the-art schemes such as Efficient Distributed Deterministic Key and Hash- based Message Authentication Code. The experimental analysis proved that the proposed scheme outperforms the other state-of-the-works in terms of computational cost, throughput, and delay.

Keywords: DDoS, security, trusted metrics, IoT

References
  1. Rao N.S.V., Poole S.W., Ma C.Y.T., He F., Zhuang J., Yau D.K.Y. Defense of cyber infrastructures against cyber-physical attacks using game-theoretic models. Risk Analysis, 2016, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12362
  2. Wang J., Yang G., Sun Y., Chen S. Defending against Sybil attacks based on received signal strength in wireless sensor networks. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2008, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 611–614.
  3. Khan G.A., Anandharaj G. A Cognitive energy efficient and trusted routing model for the security of wireless sensor networks: CEMT. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 3149–3159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08391-6
  4. Meena U., Sharma A. Secure key agreement with rekeying using FLSO routing protocol in wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 2018, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 1177–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5755-9
  5. Renold A.P., Ganesh A.B. Energy efficient secure data collection with path-constrained mobile sink in duty-cycled unattended wireless sensor network. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2019, vol. 55, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.02.002
  6. Vasudeva A., Sood M. Survey on sybil attack defense mechanisms in wireless ad hoc networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2018, vol. 120, pp. 78–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.07.006
  7. Verma R., Darak S.J., Tikkiwal V., Joshi H., Kumar R. Countermeasures against jamming attack in sensor networks with timing and power constraints. Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), 2019, pp. 485–488. https://doi.org/10.1109/comsnets.2019.8711437
  8. Fadele A.A., Othman M., Hashem I.A.T., Yaqoob I., Imran M., Shoaib M. A novel countermeasure technique for reactive jamming attack in internet of things. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, vol. 78, no. 21, pp. 29899–29920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6684-z
  9. Jia L., Xu Y., Sun Y., Feng S., Anpalagan A. Stackelberg game approaches for anti-jamming defence in wireless networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2018, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2017.1700363
  10. Korzhuk V., Groznykh A., Menshikov A., Strecker M. Identification of attacks against wireless sensor networks based on behaviour analysis. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications (JoWUA), 2019, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22667/JOWUA.2019.06.30.001
  11. Yao Y., Xiao B., Wu G., Liu X., Yu Z., Zhang K., Zhou X. Multi-channel based sybil attack detection in vehicular ad hoc networks using RSSI. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2019, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2018.2833849
  12. Gezici S., Bayram S., Kurt M.N., Gholami M.R. Optimal jammer placement in wireless localization systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, vol. 64, no. 17, pp. 4534–4549. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2016.2552503
  13. Sun H., Chen C., Hsu S. Mobile jamming attack and its countermeasure in wireless sensor networks. Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07), 2017, pp. 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ainaw.2007.255
  14. Muraleedharan R., Osadciw L.A. Jamming attack detection and countermeasures in wireless sensor network using ant system. Proceedings of SPIE, 2006, vol. 6248, pp. 62480G. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.666330
  15. Strasser M., Danev B., Čapkun S. Detection of reactive jamming in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2010, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1824766.1824772
  16. Sasikala E., Rengarajan N. An intelligent technique to detect jamming attack in wireless sensor networks (WSNs).International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2015, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-015-0009-4
  17. Alaba F.A., Awodele O., Afolabi I. Security challenges in internet of things (IoT) enabled healthcare systems. Proc. of the 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics. IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–7.
  18. Kumar P.H., AnandhaMala G.S. HMAC-R: Hash-based message authentication code and Rijndael-based multilevel security model for data storage in cloud environment. Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 3181–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04714-x
  19. Zhang X., He J., Wei Q. EDDK: Energy-efficient distributed deterministic key management for wireless sensor networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2011, no. 1, pp. 765143. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/765143
  20. Chaganti R., Bhushan B., Ravi V. A survey on Blockchain solutions in DDoS attacks mitigation: Techniques, open challenges and future directions. Computer Communications, 2023, vol. 197, pp. 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.10.026


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика