doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2024-24-3-348-356


The xanthene fluorescent dyes usage for the microplastics in soil detection and for phytotests

A. O. Nosova, M. V. Uspenskaya


Read the full article  ';
Article in Russian

For citation:
Nosova A.O., Uspenskaya M.V. The xanthene fluorescent dyes usage for the microplastics in soil detection and for phytotests. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2024, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 348–356 (in Russian). doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2024-24-3-348-356 


Abstract
The paper examines the xanthene fluorescent dyes questions available to a wide laboratories range in order to detect microplastics with an average particle length of 157 ± 59 μm in soil samples and conduct phytotests using fluorescently labeled microplastics. For the research, soils with a humus content of 1.59 ± 0.15 % (P1) and 6.74 ± 0.11 % (P2) as well as suspension polyvinyl chloride (RusVinyl LLC, 157 ± 59 μm, white) were used. In order to study the possibility of selective staining of microplastics in the presence of soil particles, polyvinyl chloride microparticles, soil P1 and P2, as well as a mixture of soil P1 and polyvinyl chloride (5 % by weight) were stained with rhodamine B, rhodamine G, fluorescein and eosin Y in isopropyl alcohol (dye concentration — 200 mg/L, temperature — 100 °C, staining time — 2 hours with constant stirring on a magnetic stirrer) and washed with distilled water on a paper filter. To study the chemical polyvinyl chloride microparticles structure before and after staining attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used (spectrometer Tensor 37 (Bruker, Germany), attenuated total internal reflection MIRacle Pike attachment with a diamond-coated ZnSe crystal). Spectrophotometry and microphotograph analysis using ImageJ software were used to determine whether dye could be leached from polyvinyl chloride microparticles after repeated washing with water. To conduct the laboratory experiment to detect microplastics in soil a mixture of P1 soil and polyvinyl chloride microparticles (0.1 % by weight) was prepared and stained with rhodamine G. In order to reduce the amount of mineral particles and concentrate polyvinyl chloride microparticles, a separation technique was used due to the difference in density using binary solution of NaCl and Ca(NO3)2. Microphotographs were obtained using an optical microscope with an additional ultraviolet source (λ = 365 nm). Image areas measurements of detected microparticles projections, that are necessary for calculating the approximate mass of the pollutant, were carried out using ImageJ software. The possibility of using fluorescently labeled polyvinyl chloride microparticles for phytotests was established using the seed germination test in contaminated soil and studying seedlings using an optical microscope with an additional ultraviolet source. It was shown that after staining with rhodamine B and rhodamine G, fluorescence is observed in polyvinyl chloride microparticles both separately and in a mixture, since soil particles P1 and P2 do not acquire similar properties. When fluorescein and eosin were used, polyvinyl chloride microparticles and soil practically did not fluoresce. It has been established that coloring does not affect the polyvinyl chloride chemical structure. Dyes are not washed out of polyvinyl chloride microparticles after repeated washing with water. The laboratory experiment showed that it is possible to detect and quantitation polyvinyl chloride microparticles in soil at the 0.1 % concentration by weight with a relative error of about 30 %. It is possible to use fluorescently labeled polyvinyl chloride microparticles with rhodamine B and rhodamine G when conducting phytotests. This research demonstrates for the first time the possibility of selective staining of polyvinyl chloride microparticles with rhodamine B and rhodamine G in a mixture with soil due to the observed fluorescence and their detection in a concentration of 0.1 % by weight. The results obtained expand knowledge in the field of monitoring microplastics in soil and, since today there are no standardized methods for detecting this pollutant, it can be used in their development. Fluorescently labeled polyvinyl chloride microparticles with rhodamine B and rhodamine G are planned to be used in phytotests as part of experiments on the hygienic justification of the maximum permissible concentration of the pollutant in the soil.

Keywords: microplastic, xanthene dyes, soil, microscopy, fluorescence, rhodamine B, rhodamine G, eosin Y, fluorescein

References
  1. Murphy F., Ewins C., Carbonnier F., Quinn B. Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 5800–5808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05416
  2. Christian A.E., Köper I. Microplastics in biosolids: A review of ecological implications and methods for identification, enumeration, and characterization. Science of The Total Environment, 2023, vol. 864, pp. 161083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161083
  3. Carpenter E.J., Smith K.L. Plastics on the Sargasso Sea surface. Science, 1972, vol. 175, no. 4027, pp. 1240–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4027.1240
  4. Thompson R.C., Olsen Y., Mitchell R.P., Davis A., Rowland S.J., John A.W., McConigle D., Russell A.E. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science, 2004, vol. 304, no. 5672, pp. 838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559
  5. He D., Luo Y., Lu S., Liu M., Song Y., Lei L. Microplastics in soils: Analytical methods, pollution characteristics and ecological risks. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2018, vol. 109, pp. 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.006
  6. Zhang Z., Zhao S., Chen L., Duan C., Zhang X., Fang L. A review of microplastics in soil: Occurrence, analytical methods, combined contamination and risks. Environmental Pollution, 2022, vol. 306, pp. 119374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119374
  7. Sturm M.T., Horn H., Schuhen K. The potential of fluorescent dyes—comparative study of Nile red and three derivatives for the detection of microplastics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2021, vol. 413, no. 4, pp. 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-03066-w
  8. Löder M.G., Gerdts G. Methodology used for the detection and identification of microplastics—a critical appraisal. Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_8
  9. Perez C.N., Carré F., Hoarau-Belkhiri A., Joris A., Leonards P.E.G., Lamoree M.H. Innovations in analytical methods to assess the occurrence of microplastics in soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 107421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107421
  10. Krasovitckii B.M., Bolotin B.M. Organic Luminescent Materials. 2nd ed. Moscow, Himija Publ., 1984, 336 p. (in Russian)
  11. Stepanov B.I. Introduction to the Chemistry and Technology of the Organic Dyes. 3rd ed. Moscow, Himija Publ., 1984, 592 p. (in Russian)
  12. Lv L., Qu J., Yu Z., Chen D., Zhou C., Hong P., Li C. A simple method for detecting and quantifying microplastics utilizing fluorescent dyes - Safranine T, fluorescein isophosphate, Nile red based on thermal expansion and contraction property. Environmental Pollution, 2019, vol. 255, part 2, pp. 113283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113283
  13. Tong H., Jiang Q., Zhong X., Hu X. Rhodamine B dye staining for visualizing microplastics in laboratory-based studies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4209–4215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10801-4
  14. Le Quoc P., Fokina M.I., Martynova D.M., Olekhnovich R.O., Uspenskaya M.V. Method of manufacturing and staining microplastics for using in the biological experiments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, vol. 29, no. 44, pp. 67450–67455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22776-5
  15. Azeem I., Adeel M., Ahmad M.A., Shakoor N., Jiangcuo G.D., Azeem K., Ishfaq M., Shakoor A., Ayaz M., Xu M., Rui Y. Uptake and accumulation of nano/microplastics in plants: a critical review. Nanomaterials, 2021, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112935
  16. Li T., Wang Y., Jiao M., Zhao Z., Li R., Qin C. Distinct microplastics abundance variation in root-associated sediments revealed the underestimation of mangrove microplastics pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, vol. 899, pp. 165611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165611
  17. Li L., Luo Y., Peijnenburg W.J., Li R., Yang J., Zhou Q. Confocal measurement of microplastics uptake by plants. MethodsX, 2020, vol. 7, pp. 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.023
  18. Morgun A.V., Khilazheva E.D., Boitcova E.B. Using the ImageJ / FIJI Software Package for Image Processing. Krasnoyarsk, KrasSMU Publ., 2018, 72 p. (in Russian)
  19. Nosova A.O., Varfolomeeva A.E., Uspenskaya M.V., Olekhnovich R.O. The possibilities of applying thermal analysis methods to detect pvc microplastics in soil. Fundamental and Applied Problems of Technics and technology, 2023, no. 5(361), pp. 99–109. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33979/2073-7408-2023-361-5-99-109
  20. Gavrilova N.N., Nazarov V.V., Iarovaia O.V. Microscopic Methods for Determining Particle Sizes of Dispersed Materials. Moscow, D.I. Mendeleev Russian University of Chemical Technology, 2012, 56 p. (in Russian)
  21. Sergeev M.N. Calculating the volume of an infinite dimensional sphere. Akademicheskaja publicistika, 2021, no. 7, pp. 28–33. (in Rusian)
  22. Liu S., Shang E., Liu J., Wang Y., Bolan N., Kirkham M.B., Li Y. What have we known so far for fluorescence staining and quantification of microplastics: a tutorial review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2022, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1442-2
  23. Nechiporenko A.P., Nechiporenko U.Yu., Sitnikova V.E. Fourier spectroscopy in blood plasma study with type two diabetes. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 52–64. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-1-52-64
  24. Usoltsev D.A., Sitnikova V.E., Nosenko T.N., Olekhnovich R.O., Uspenskaya M.V. Comparison of protein secondary structure calculation methods based on infrared spectra deconvolution. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 586–593. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-4-586-593
  25. Gao Z., Wontor K., Cizdziel J.V. Labeling microplastics with fluorescent dyes for detection, recovery, and degradation experiments. Molecules, 2022, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 7415. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217415


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика