ENG
РУС
Search
Menu
About the Edition
Open Access Statement
Editorial Board
Editorial Policy
Editorial Ethics
Rules for peer-review
Rules for presentation of papers
Forms of Submitted Documents
Recommendations for the Design of References to Our Journal
Editorial Staff
Information for Subscribers
Summaries of the Issue
List of Authors
Issues
Publishers license agreement
Procedure of work with personal data
Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Editor-in-Chief

Nikiforov
Vladimir O.
D.Sc., Prof.
Partners













































doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2024-24-1-81-89

A novel strategic trajectory-based protocol for enhancing efficiency in wireless sensor networks

R. Gopalakrishnan, S. Angamuthu


Read the full article  ';
Article in English

For citation:
Gopalakrishnan R., Sentil Kumar A. A novel strategic trajectory-based protocol for enhancing efficiency in wireless sensor networks. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2024, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 81–89. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2024-24-1-81-89


Abstract
This research presents a comprehensive approach to enhance the efficiency and performance of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) by addressing critical challenges, such as race conditions, reservation problems, and redundant data. A novel protocol combining Self-Adaptive Redundancy Elimination Clustering and Distributed Load Bandwidth Management is proposed to mitigate these challenges. The work intelligently extracts transmission hops and any-cast transmission features from diversity traffic information obtained through trace files, to eliminate nodes harboring redundant data. To optimize network organization, the number of clusters is dynamically adjusted according to the node density using the affinity propagation technique. Furthermore, load balancing is achieved by reallocating available bandwidth through bandwidth re-segmentation. The research also delves into the Proposed Network Infrastructure and Channel Coordination. The architecture encompasses cooperative clustering of nodes, strategic access point selection, data compression, and channel migration. By fostering collaboration among nodes within clusters, selecting access points judiciously, and employing efficient data compression techniques, the network overall efficiency is significantly improved. Channel migration strategies further bolster the network agility and responsiveness. The integration of Channel Sensing enriches the approach by collecting channel state information, enriched with spatial and temporal node information. This added insight empowers the network to make more informed decisions regarding channel allocation and coordination contributing to reduced interference and optimized data transmission. As a result of the work, the proposed methodology achieves remarkable results, including an average Packet Delivery Ratio of 99.1 % and an average reduction of packet loss by 4.3 % compared to existing studies. Additionally, the proposed protocol exhibits an average throughput improvement of 4.7 % and reduces average network delay to 52 milliseconds highlighting its significant contributions to the enhancement of WSN performance.

Keywords: wireless sensor networks, redundancy elimination clustering, security

References
  1. Akyildiz F., Su W., Sankarasubramaniam Y., Cayirci E. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communication Magazine, 2002, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2002.1024422
  2. Cheng W.C., Chou C., Golubchik L., Khuller S., Wan Y.C. A coordinated data collection approach: design, evaluation, and comparison. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 2004, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 2004–2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.836009
  3. Xu K., Hassanein H., Takahara G., Wang Q. Relay node deployment strategies in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2010, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2009.105
  4. Chandrasekaran V., Shanmugam A. A review on hierarchical cluster based routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal Global Research in Computer Science, 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 12–16.
  5. Hou Y., Shi Y., Sherali H., Midkiff S. On energy provisioning and relay node placement for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, 2005, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2579–2590. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2005.853969
  6. Sanjana S., Shavanthi L., Bhagya R. Analysis of energy aware sleep scheduling routing protocol (EASSR) in wireless sensor networks. Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control (I2C2), 2017, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2C2.2017.8321920
  7. Mahdi O.A., Wahab A.W.A., Idris M.Y.I., Znaid A.A., Al-Mayouf Y.R.B., Khan S. WDARS: A weighted data aggregation routing strategy with minimum link cost in event-driven WSNs. Journal of Sensors, 2016, vol. 2016, pp. 3428730. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3428730
  8. Zahedi A., Arghavani M., Parandin F., Arghavani A. Energy efficient reservation-based cluster head selection in WSNs. Wireless Personal Communication, 2018, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5189-9
  9. Rhee I., Warrier A., Min J., Xu L. DRAND: Distributed randomized TDMA scheduling for wireless ad-hoc networks. MobiHoc '06: Proc. of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad hoc Networking and Computing, 2006, pp. 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132905.1132927
  10. Korzhuk V., Groznykh A., Menshikov A., Strecker M. Identification of attacks against wireless sensor networks based on behaviour analysis. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications (JoWUA), 2019, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22667/JOWUA.2019.06.30.001
  11. Tunca C., Isik S., Donmez M., Ersoy C. Distributed mobile sink routing for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2014, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 877–897. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.100113.00293
  12. Luo H., Ye F., Cheng J., Lu S., Zhang L. TTDD: Two-tier data dissemination in large-scale wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 2005, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-004-4753-x
  13. Behera T.M., Mohapatra S.K., Samal U.C., Khan M.S., Daneshmand M., Gandomi A.H. Residual energy-based cluster-head selection in wsns for iot application. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5132–5139. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2019.2897119
  14. Jain S., Pattanaik K., Shukla A. QWRP: Query-driven virtual wheel based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019, vol. 147, pp. 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102430
  15. Maurya S., Gupta V., Jain V.K. LBRR: Load balanced ring routing protocol for heterogeneous sensor networks with sink mobility. Proc. of the 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2017, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/wcnc.2017.7925728
  16. Tunca C., Isik S., Donmez M.Y., Ersoy C. Ring routing: An energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks with a mobile sink. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2015, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1947–1960. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2014.2366776
  17. Jain S., Sharma S., Bagga N. A vertical and horizontal segregation based data dissemination protocol. Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications, Springer, 2016, pp. 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2553-9_37
  18. Lin Y.C., Zhong J.-H. Hilbert-chain topology for energy conservation in large-scale wireless sensor networks. Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing (UIC/ATC), 2012, pp. 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/uic-atc.2012.37
  19. Khodashahi M.H., Tashtarian F., Moghaddam M.H.Y., Honary M.T. Optimal location for mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. Proc. of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2010, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/wcnc.2010.5506171
  20. Zhao M., Ma M., Yang Y. Efficient data gathering with mobile collectors and space-division multiple access technique in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transaction in Computers, 2011, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2010.140
  21. Tang X., Xu J. Adaptive data collection strategies for lifetime-constrained wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions in Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2008, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2008.27
  22. Li X., Jia Z., Zhang P., Zhang R., Wang H. Trust-based on-demand multipath routing in mobile ad hoc networks. IET Information Security, 2010, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2009.0140
  23. Praveena A., Sangeetha R., Prem P.E. Efficient trusted secure ad-hoc on-demand multipath distance vector in MANET. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 2017, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1614–1620.
  24. Patel V.H., Zaveri M.A., Rath H.K. Trust based routing in mobile ad-hoc networks. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, 2015, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 318–324. https://doi.org/10.7763/lnse.2015.v3.212


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Copyright 2001-2024 ©
Scientific and Technical Journal
of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics.
All rights reserved.

Яндекс.Метрика