INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE PROVIDING BEHAVIORAL FEATURE

The paper deals with creation of integrated information system architecture capable of supporting management decisions using behavioral features. The paper considers the architecture of information decision support system for production system management. The behavioral feature is given to an information system, and it ensures extraction, processing of information, management decision-making with both automated and automatic modes of decision-making subsystem being permitted. Practical implementation of information system with behavior is based on service-oriented architecture: there is a set of independent services in the information system that provides data of its subsystems or data processing by separate application under the chosen variant of the problematic situation settlement. For creation of integrated information system with behavior we propose architecture including the following subsystems: data bus, subsystem for interaction with the integrated applications based on metadata, business process management subsystem, subsystem for the current state analysis of the enterprise and management decision-making, behavior training subsystem. For each problematic situation a separate logical layer service is created in Unified Service Bus handling problematic situations. This architecture reduces system information complexity due to the fact that with a constant amount of system elements the number of links decreases, since each layer provides communication center of responsibility for the resource with the services of corresponding applications. If a similar problematic situation occurs, its resolution is automatically removed from problem situation metamodel repository and business process metamodel of its settlement. In the business process performance commands are generated to the corresponding centers of responsibility to settle a problematic situation. 

1. Volkov A.A., Nabatov R.A., Shchekochikhin O.V. Adaptive automated system for information collection and display business management. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2008, no. 46, pp. 3–6. (In Russian)
2. Shvedenko V.N., Veselova N.S. Enterprise information resources modeling for process organization of enterprise management system. Programmnye Produkty i Sistemy, 2014, no. 4, pp. 260–264. (In Russian) doi: 10.15827/0236-235X.108.260-264
3. Shvedenko V.N., Volkov A.A. Model of parallel structures organization in oop. Programmnye Produkty i Sistemy, 2011, no. 3, p. 3.
4. Shvedenko V.N., Schekochikhin O.V., Shvedenko P.V. Evaluation criteria and models of information systems with the property of behavior. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2016, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 649–654. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2016-16-4-649-654
5. Kluchko V.I., Shumkov E.A., Vlasenko A.V., Karnizian R.O. Architecture of decision support systems. Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2013, vol. 86, pp. 290–299.
6. Fatuev V.A., Safronova M.A., Rodnenkova I.Yu. The concept of development of tools for design of systems of support of decision-making at management of dynamic systems. News of the Tula State University. Technical Sciences, 2012, no. 12–2, pp. 211–218.
7. Kilina A.A., Parinov M.V., Chizhov M.I. System architecture supporting decision and control project making. The Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University, 2011, no. 12-2, pp. 41–44.
8. Khakpour N., Arbab F., Rutten E. Synthesizing structural and behavioral control for reconfigurations in component-based systems. Formal Aspects of Computing, 2016, vol. 28, pp. 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s00165-015-0346-y
9. Li W., Liu K., Liu S. Semiotics in interoperation for information systems working collaboratively. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2015, vol. 454, pp. 370–386. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46549-3_24
10. Liu S., Li W., Liu K., Han J. Evaluation frameworks for information systems integration: from a semiotic lens. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science. UK, 2013, pp. 559–568.
11. Konersmann M., Goedicke M. Integrating protocol contracts with program code – a leightweight approach for applied behaviour models that respect their execution context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2015, vol. 6368, pp. 197–219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21912-7_8
12. Panetto H., Molina A. Enterprise integration and interoperability in manufacturing systems: trends and issues. Computers in Industry, 2008, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 641–646. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.010
13. McNeile A.T., Roubtsova E.E. Programming in protocols - a paradigm of behavioral programming. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. ENASE. Funchal, Portugal, 2008, pp. 23–30.
14. Djajadikerta H.G., Roni S.M., Trireksani T. Dysfunctional information system behaviors are not all created the same: challenges to the generalizability of security-based research. Information and Management, 2015, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1012–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.07.008
15. Pavlov A.M., Shvedenko V.V., Shvedenko P.V. The metric system of assessing performance in an object-process-based software package Cobra++: its purpose and structure. Tekhnicheskie Nauki - ot Teorii k Praktike, 2015, no. 44, pp. 14–21.
16. Yahia E., Aubry A., Panetto H. Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Computers in Industry, 2012, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 443–457. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2012.01.010
17. Izza S. Integration of industrial information systems: from syntactic to semantic integration approaches. Enterprise Information Systems, 2009, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–57. doi: 10.1080/17517570802521163
18. Mitchell V.L. Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 2006, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 919–939.
 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License